Systems and Means of Informatics
2026, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 140-163
AN ARCHITECTURE OF RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE DOMAIN OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
- N. A. Kalinin
- N. A. Skvortsov
- S. A. Stupnikov
Abstract
As interdisciplinary research infrastructures evolve, the necessity to adapt them to the specific needs of particular domains increases. Universal solutions aimed at providing researchers with generalized types of research data cannot be equally effective for different research domains. In particular, common infrastructures do not sufficiently account for the features of artifacts such as software code, machine learning models, and computational experiments, which complicates the use of research infrastructures for solving problems in computer science. An approach to adapting a basic infrastructure to the specifics of a particular research domain is proposed. This approach includes analyzing needs of the domain, identifying the features of the research artifacts used, formulating requirements for the infrastructure, and designing a research infrastructure architecture that takes into account the domain-specific requirements. The practical applicability of the approach is demonstrated through a computer science case study. An architecture for a research infrastructure is proposed, including basic universal subsystems and extensible with specialized subsystems.
To meet the needs of researchers in computer science, the necessity of supporting multiversion software artifacts and integrating software development and code execution tools is substantiated. The results obtained can be used in the design of research infrastructures in other domains.
[+] References (32)
- Wilkinson, M.D., M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, et al. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3(1): 1 {9. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
- Holub, P., F. Kohlmayer, F. Prasser, et al. 2018. Enhancing reuse of data and biological material in medical research: From FAIR to FAIR-health. Biopreserv. Biobank. 16(2):97{105. doi: 10.1089/bio.2017.0110.
- Lamprecht, A.L., L. Garcia, M. Kuzak, et al. 2020. Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science 3(1):37{59. doi: 10.3233/DS-190026.
- Marti-Garcia, A., C. Alvarez-Romero, E. Roman-Villaran, M. Bernabeu-Wittel, and C. L. Parra-Calderon. 2023. FAIR principles to improve the impact on health research management outcomes. Heliyon 9(5):e15733. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15733.
- Kalinin, N. A., andN. A. Skvortsov. 2023. Difficulties of FAIR principles implementation in cross-domain research infrastructures. Lobachevskii J. Mathematics 44(1): 147{ 156. doi: 10.1134/S199508022301016X.
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, DCC, DANS, EFIS, Visionary Analytics. 2022. European Research Data Landscape. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Final Report. doi: 10.2777/3648.
- Zenodo. Available at: https://www.zenodo.org/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- White, H., S. Carrier, A. Thompson, J. Greenberg, and R. Scherle. 2008. The Dryad data repository. 8th Conference (International) on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications Proceedings. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 157{162. doi: 10.18452/1261.
- Pampel, H., P. Vierkant, F. Scholze, et al. 2013. Making research data repositories visible: The re3data.org registry. PLOS ONE 8(11):e78080. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0078080.
- Sansone, S. A., P. McQuilton, P. Rocca-Serra, et al. 2019. FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nat. Biotechnol. 37(4):358{367. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8.
- Manghi, P., A. Bardi, C. Atzori, et al. 2019. The OpenAIRE research graph data model. OpenAIRE Blog. Available at: https://zenodo.org/records/2643199 (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Knoth, P., L. Anastasiou, M. Cancellieri, et al. 2019. Aggregating the world's open access research papers. figshare. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9761876.
- Fernandez-del Castillo, E., D. Scardaci, and A. L. Garcia. 2015. The EGI Federated Cloud e-infrastructure. Procedia Comput. Sci. 68:196{205. doi: 10.1016/ j.procs.2015.09.235.
- Zinn, C. 2018. The language resource switchboard. Comput. Linguist. 44(4):631-639. doi: 10.1162/coli_a_00329.
- Foster, E.D., and A. Deardorff. 2017. Open Science Framework (OSF). J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 105(2):203. doi: 10.5195/JMLA.2017.88.
- Starr, J., and A. Gastl. 2011. isCitedBy - a metadata scheme for DataCite. D-Lib Magazine 17(1/2). doi: 10.1045/january2011-starr.
- Dryad Data. Available at: https://datadryad.org (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Science Data Bank. Available at: https://www.scidb.cn (accessed April 5, 2026).
- B2SHARE Usage. Available at: https://b2share.eudat.eu/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Harvard Dataverse. Available at: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Figshare. Available at: https://www.digital-science.com/products/hgshare/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Mathematical Research-Data Repository. Available at: https://www.re3data.org/ repository/r3d100014221 (accessed April 5, 2026).
- OpenAIRE. Available at: https://openaire.eu/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- European Open Science Cloud. Available at: https://open-science-cloud.ec.europa.eu/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- CORE. Available at: https://core.ac.uk (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Shaharudin, A., B. Van Loenen, and M. Janssen. 2022. Towards a common definition of open data intermediaries. Digital Government Research Practice 4(2): 1-21. doi: 10.1145/3585537.
- EOSC Marketplace. Available at: https://eoscfuture.eu/eosc-marketplace/ (accessed April 5, 2026).
- Brewster, C., B. Nouwt, S. Raaijmakers, and J. Verhoosel. 2020. Ontology- based access control for FAIR data. Data Intelligence 2(1-2):66-77. doi: 10.1162/ dint_a_00029.
- Farnel, S., and A. Shiri. 2014. Metadata for research data: Current practices and trends. 14th Conference (International) on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications Proceedings. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 74-82. doi: 10.23106/dcmi.952136534.
- Quarati, A., and J.E. Raffaghelli. 2022. Do researchers use open research data? Exploring the relationships between usage trends and metadata quality across scientific disciplines from the Figshare case. J. Inform. Sci. 48(4):423-448. doi: 10.1177/ 0165551520961048.
- Wolf, M., J. Logan, K. Mehta, et al. 2021. Reusability first: Toward FAIR workflows. Conference (International) on Cluster Computing Proceedings. IEEE. 444-455. doi: 10.1109/Cluster48925.2021.00053.
- Wahle, J.P., T. Ruas, Saif M. Mohammad, and B. Gipp. 2022. D3: A massive dataset of scholarly metadata for analyzing the state of computer science research. 10th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference Proceedings. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association. 2642-2651. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.13384.pdf (accessed April 5, 2026).
[+] About this article
Title
AN ARCHITECTURE OF RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE DOMAIN OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
Journal
Systems and Means of Informatics
Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 140-163
Cover Date
2026-05-05
DOI
10.14357/08696527260109
Print ISSN
0869-6527
Publisher
Institute of Informatics Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences
Additional Links
Key words
FAIR principles; domain analysis; research infrastructures; computer science
Authors
N. A. Kalinin  , N. A. Skvortsov  , and S. A. Stupnikov
Author Affiliations
 Federal Research Center "Computer Science and Control", Russian Academy of Sciences, 44-2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation
|